LAW1000 Exam Questions 1. Nino Rota bought a house from Arthur Fiedler. There was a shed on the property, but it was not mentioned in the agreement of purchase and sale. When Nino closed the deal and moved in he saw that the shed structure had been removed by Arthur and only the foundation remained. Which of the following statements is TRUE? O Nino had a right to the shed because it is part of the land. O Nino had no right to the shed because it was not mentioned in the agreement of purchase and sale. O Nino had no right to the shed because it was removed from the land prior to her moving in. O Nino had a right to the shed because its inclusion was an implied warranty of the agreement. O Nino had a right to the shed because its inclusion was an implied condition of the agreement