Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

LAWS 310 The Legal Environment Final Exam Follow Link Below To Get Tutorial https://homeworklance.com/downloads/laws-310-legal-environment-final-exam/ Description: 1. (TCO 4) The Hagues owned a tract of land

LAWS 310 The Legal Environment Final Exam

Follow Link Below To Get Tutorial

https://homeworklance.com/downloads/laws-310-legal-environment-final-exam/

Description:

1. (TCO 4) The Hagues owned a tract of land that they decided to sell. They signed a listing agreement with Harvey Hilgendorf, a licensed real estate broker, which gave Hilgendorf the right to list the property for 12 months. According to the agreement, Hilgendorf would be paid a 6% commission if a bona fide buyer was found during the listing period. Five months later, the Hagues sent Hilgendorf a letter terminating the listing agreement, although Hilgendorf did not agree to the termination. One month later, Hilgendorf presented an offer to the Hagues from a buyer willing to purchase the property at full value. The Hagues ignored the offer and sold it themselves. Hilgendorf sued the Hagues for breach of the agency agreement.

Did the Hagues act ethically? How should the lawsuit be decided?

. (TCO 1) The city of Anytown, Florida, enacts a city zoning ordinance that prohibits outdoor advertising display signs, which includes neon signs and billboards, because it is concerned about traffic safety and aesthetics. A local business, Billboards R Us, believes that this ordinance is unconstitutional in that it violates the First Amendment protection of commercial speech. Billboards R Us sues the city of Anytown alleging that the zoning ordinance is unconstitutional.

What is commercial speech? What parameters has the Supreme Court placed on commercial speech? Based on the definition of commercial speech, analyze whether this zoning ordinance would be considered constitutional. If it is unconstitutional, can the city place any restrictions on commercial speech?

3. (TCO 8) The federal government of the United States can enter into a treaty with the country of Uganda that agrees to reduce trade barriers between them. However, the state of Arizona cannot enter into a treaty with the country of Uganda that reduces trade barriers between Arizona and Uganda. Give reasons to explain the scenario.

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image_2

Step: 3

blur-text-image_3

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

CFIN

Authors: Scott Besley, Eugene Brigham

5th edition

1305661656, 9781305888036 , 978-1305666870

More Books

Students also viewed these Finance questions

Question

What did Tolman mean by intervening variable?

Answered: 1 week ago