laws and addressing issues related to discrimination against ELL students. The impact on accountability, assessment, funding, and identification in ELL education in Arizona will depend on the specific findings and resolutions resulting from investigations into civil rights violations. Resolutions may lead to changes in policies and practices to promote equity and eliminate discrimination in education for ELL students.Proposition 203Proposition 203, passed in Arizona in 2000, mandated English immersion oprograms for English Language Learners. It significantly impacted language acquisition by promoting immersion in English-only instruction, limiting the use of bilingual education. Student grouping changed as ELLs were integrated into regular classrooms, minimizing separate language-focused classes. The time frame for language proficiency was implicit, emphasizing rapid acquisition through immersion. It did not specify a particular time frame for achieving language proficiency. However, the emphasis on English immersion suggested a goal of relatively rapid language acquisition. Proposition 203 was controversial, with supporters arguing that English immersion would lead to quicker language acquisition and improved academic outcomes. At the same time, critics expressed concerns about potential adverse effects on students' educational experiences and academic achievement.House Bill 2010House Bill 2010 in Arizona addressed English Language Proficiency (ELP) ostandards and had implications for language acquisition methodology, student grouping, and the time frame to achieve language proficiency. It affected language acquisition by establishing rigorous ELP standards for ELLs. Student grouping saw more tailored language support, aligning with individual language proficiency levels. The time frame for language proficiency remained flexible, accommodating diverse learning paces. The Bill Arizona positively impacted language acquisition methodology by emphasizing evidence-based practices, influencing student grouping by promoting tailored language support, and contributing to a more structured approach to achieving language proficiency throughout a student's education. The bill aimed to enhance the quality of language instruction and support for English Language Learners in the state.House Bill 2064House Bill 206