Leadership The power between the divergent styles that Keller and Petrou represent reveals the dynamics of leadership and management. Keller's practical and proactive attitude is very different from Petrou's methodical and detached technique. Keller's leadership orientation towards a behavioral perspective emphasizes the significance of leaders' actions in shaping the motivation and performance of the people they influence. Keller's extroverted nature is apparent through his outgoing, friendly, and conversational traits, which have enabled him to cultivate a strong network with distributors and effectively communicate to secure financial gains for the company. However, his assertive vocal authority approach can sometimes be overbearing, and his hurried manner contrasts with Petrou's more reserved disposition. Petrou's absence of transformative leadership attributes, which are marked by strict adherence to norms, inflexibility, and limited delegating, intensifies the dispute. While Petrou's practical, traditional, and data-driven approaches enable him to be a dependable, detail-oriented project manager, his rigid beliefs are making things more difficult for Keller. Petrou's goal was to communicate the vision, rather than micromanaging Petrou's business by taking a hands-on approach, Keller should have seized the opportunity to lead by example, model the way, and coach Petrou. This would have built Petrou's credibility and self-confidence among his subordinates as well as Ke