Lee v Knapp [1967] 2 QB 442 is a decision dealing with: O a. The doctrine of frustration O b. The Golden Rule O c. The purposive approach O d. The mischief approachWhere events have occurred that makes it impossible for a part},r to perform under a contract the contract is said to be: '3 a. breached '3 b. void for uncertainty '3 c. frustrated '3 d. rescinded For a person to be considered a 'consumer,' the current definition of s 3 of the Australian Consumer Law [as modified by the Treasury Laws Amendment (Acquisition as Consumer Financial Thresholds) Regulations 2020) requires that: '3 a. The goods or services do not exceed $100,000 in price C) b The goods or services are of the kind ordinarily acquired for personal, household or domestic use or ' consumption C) c The goods or services are a vehicle or trailer acquired mainly in the transport ofgoods ofordinarilyr ' acquired for personal, household use or consumption '3 d. All ofthe above Which of the following is TRUE about 'terms' of a contract? a. Remedies for breach of a term lie under the law of negligence O b. Terms are pre-contractual O c. A term is a statement of fact O d. Terms could be classified as 'conditions' or warranties