Legal inquiry analysis Case study Zurich insurance Co. V. Ontario (Human Rights Commission) five-step legal inquiry framework Step 1: identify the key facts of this case Step 2: identify the legal issues in this case(in form of a question) Step 3: identify the relevant law Step 4: Apply the law to the specific facts( you could have argued for either the complainant or the respondent) Step 5: draw a conclusion What's your position? Write points form reason for each statement to support your position. 1) an employer should be permitted to hire any person he/she wants, even if his/her policies discriminate against others. After all, it his/her business and he/she allowed to run the company as he/she sees fits. 2) an employer should always be required to accommodate the specific needs of a worker if it is necessary to do so. There should never be any acceptable excuse not to accommodate a worker. 3) if a worker in business doesn't like the company policies because he/she feels that the policies are discriminatory, then the employees should just wander find job somewhere else