legal mlalpi act 8. David Gorski was charged with fraudulently representing that Legion Construction was a Service-Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business Entity (SDVOSBE) in order to qualify for and obtain government contracts. The essence of the criminal case against Gorski is that he, a nonveteran, made false statements about the ownership, operation, and control of Legion to appear to be in compliance with the SDVOSBE eligibility requirements while retaining effective ownership and control of the company for himself. Legion retained a law firm, Mintz Levin, to carry out a corporate restructuring to make it falsely appear that the corporation was in compliance with revisions to the eligibility requirements. When the trial court ordered the law firm to produce documents it prepared in connection with the restructuring, Legion and Gorski argued that the communications were protected by the attorney-client privilege. Should the law firm be compelled to produce the documents? Explain