Leibeck v. Mcdonalds 1994

Section 1: Provide a brief summary of the facts of the case and its procedural history. (2 points) Section 2: What are the different elements of a tort case the plaintiff must prove to win her case? (5 points) Section 3: Describe the burden of proof required for the plaintiff to win this case. In other words, how much evidence did the plaintiff need in order to win? (2 points) Section 4: Describe the two primary duties the plaintiff asserted were owed to her by McDonald's. (2 points) Section 5: What damages did the plaintiff ask McDonald's to pay her? Be specific. (2 points) Section 6: Identify and name two primary defenses asserted by McDonald's in this case. (2 points) Section 7: What was the decision of the jury in the case? Be specific. (2 points) Section 8: The judge changed the jury's decision. How was the decision changed? Why do you think he did this? (3 points) Section 9: How did this case ultimately end? (2 points) Section 10: Do you agree with the court's ruling and the case's outcome? Apply course concepts to explain and support your position. (3 points) Take this question seriously and do not provide a simple "I agree" or "I disagree." Explain your position in detail