Let's see whether quadratic voting can avoid the paradox of voting that arose in Table 5.3 when using 1 piv in a series of paired-choice majority votes. To reexamine this situation using quadratic voting, the table below presents the maximum willingness to pay of Garcia. Johnson, and Lee for each of the three public goods. Notice that each person's numbers for willingness to pay match her or his ordering of preferences (ist choice, 2 nd choice, 3rd choice) presented in Table 5.3. Thus, Garcia is willing to spend more on her first choice of national defense ($400) than on her second cholce of a road ($100) or her third choice of a weather waming system (SO). TABLE 5.3 Paradox of Voting a. Assume that voting will be done using a quadratic voting system and that Garcia, Johnson, and Lee are each given $500 that can only be spent on purchasing votes (L.e, any unspent money has to be returned). How many votes will Garcia purchase to support national defense? How many for the road? Place those values into the appropriate blanks in the table below and then do the same for the blanks for Johnson and Lee. Assume there are no additional costs beyond the cost of purchasing votes and that votes must be purchased in whole numbers. Instructions: Enter your answers as a whole number. b. Across all three voters, how many votes are there in favor of national defense? The road? The weather warning system? Votes for national defense: Votes for road: Votes for weather warning system: c. If a paired-choice vote is taken of national defense versus the road, which one wins? b. Across all three voters, how many votes are there in favor of national defense? The road? The weather warning system? Votes for national defense: Votes for road: Votes for weather warning system: c. If a paired-choice vote is taken of national defense versus the road, which one wins? d. If a paired-choice vote is taken of the road versus the weather warning system, which one wins? e. If a paired-choice vote is taken of national defense versus the weather warning system, which one wins