Levi signs up to sell pest control in Texas for the summer. Apart from being promised that he'll make "at least $100,000," he's also told that he'll be an independent contractor. Unfortunately, he only makes $500. Worse still, he accidentally kills Mamma P's cat, a rare Sphynx cat worth approximately $50,000. Levi doesn't have that money, so Mamma P sues Levi's employer. Which of the following is the best argument that Levi was an independent contractor, thus relieving the employer of liability?

Group of answer choices

Levi had excellent sales skills.

Levi had only started working 1 month prior.

The employer only paid Levi at the end of the summer.

The employer exercised no control of the details of Levi's work.