Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

Linda went to fu Inc. to purchase a used car. The salesman told himfu would guarantee any car it sold for 3 months for any

Linda went to fu Inc. to purchase a used car. The salesman told himfu would guarantee any car it sold for 3 months for any problems and the sales brochure stated this also. Linda liked one car and asked the salesman if it had ever been used as a rental car. The salesman told him they had bought it from a private owner not a rental agency. The car cost $20,000 and Linda was going to pay for it over a 2 year period.fu Incwas concerned that Lindamay not be able to meet the payments, so it requested that Lindaget someone to guarantee his payments. Linda asked his 75 year old mother, Maria, who only understood Spanish, to guarantee his car loan. Maria didn't want to sign anything but Paul reminded her that she had often lent his sisters money. Maria went to Car City and said she didn't want to lose any money and the car salesman assured her that her signature was just a formality and she had no need to worry. Maria signed the guarantee. Six weeks later Linda had major problems with the car and he found out it had been a rental car for the first year. It would cost $15,000 to make the necessary repairs to make the car safe to drive. Linda was furious and toldfu Inche wanted them to take the car back and get a full refund. fu Inc just laughed and told him to read the contract, which clearly stated in bold type that the company only guaranteed the car for 2 weeks and this agreement was the entire agreement. Linda stopped making his payments andfu Inchas contacted Maria for the money. Maria is confused and says she owes them nothing. All parties have contacted lawyers. Please apply the law to the facts of this case. You should be discussing multiple legal issues that apply to the facts.

C2. Emma and Jordyn are at the lake, enjoying a beautiful day. They decide to rent a sailboat and go for a ride. Although they are both good sailors, Emma falls overboard when the safety harness on the boat breaks. Emma is not wearing a life jacket. Jordyn jumps overboard, rescues Emma and drags her back into the boat, but Emma breaks a rib in the process. a) Emma wants to sue the boat rental company. What tort would she rely on? b) What does Emma need to prove? Describe each element of the tort. c)Describe 1 defence that the boat company could use to reduce or avoid liability. d)Emma learns that Noah, the boat company employee, did not test the safety harness, although he is supposed to do this before the boat is taken out. Explain how the principle of vicarious liability would apply in this situation. e) Assume that when Emma and Jordyn both left the boat, the boat drifted into a nearby dock and damaged it. Would the boat rental company be responsible for the damage to the dock? Please have your answers corespond to the letters. (a to e)

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Elliott And Quinn's Criminal Law

Authors: Louise Taylor

12th Edition

1292208481, 978-1292208480

More Books

Students also viewed these Law questions

Question

Let Explain.

Answered: 1 week ago