Question
Lisa and Raul Galaz were divorced in 2002. As part of the divorce settlement, Lisa was granted a 25 percent interest in Artist Rights Foundation,
Lisa and Raul Galaz were divorced in 2002. As part of the divorce settlement, Lisa was granted a 25 percent interest in Artist Rights Foundation, LLC. (ARF), a California limited liability company formed by Raul. One of ARF's assets was royalties accruing from the music of a band known as the Ohio Players. The royalties generated almost $1 million between 2005 and 2010, but Lisa received no share of the profits despite her ownership interest in ARF. Raul claimed that he had exclusive rights to the royalties as such rights were purchased in 2005 by Segundo Suenos LLC a Texas limited liability company, formed by Raul and his father Alfredo. ARF was subsequently dissolved in 2006 Lisa subsequently filed for bankruptcy and sought a court order declaring the transfer of rights from ARF to Segundo Suenos to be invalid. One of the issues before the court was whether the purported transfer of royalties from ARF to Segundo Suenos was a fraudulent transfer. The court focused its attention on the presence or absence of several "badges of fraud." What is a "badge of fraud"? What type of conduct should be considered indicative of fraud in the context of bankruptcy proceedings? [In re Galaz, 2010 WL 4702446 (W.D. Tex. 2010)]
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started