ljusted WACC is 11%. calculations. Round your answers to two decimal places. NPV:$IRR:million% intermediate calculations. Round your answers to two decimal places. NPV: $ million IRR: % b. How should the environmental effects be dealt with when this project is evaluated? not doing the environmental mitigation. II. The environmental effects should be ignored since the mine is legal without mitigation. III. The environmental effects should be treated as a sunk cost and therefore ignored. a "no mitigation" analysis. V. The environmental effects should be treated as a remote possibility and should only be considered at the time in which they actually occur. c. Should this project be undertaken? If so, should the firm do the mitigation? is greater than its IRR when mitigation costs are included in the analysis. greater than its NPV when mitigation costs are not included in the analysis. is greater than its NPV when mitigation costs are included in the analysis. greater than its IRR when mitigation costs are not included in the analysis. greater than its NPV when mitigation costs are not included in the analysis. c. Should this project be undertaken