Locate two peer-reviewed articles (related to the ethics) published within the last 3 years in a peer-reviewed journal, then present an assessment comprising of a precise and critical evaluation. Do not summarize the article. First synthesize the position of the authors. Then, evaluate the information presented in the article. Evaluate the information presented in the article for truth.

Is there bias or faulty reasoning? You must support claims of both fact and faulty reasoning.

What are both author's saying the same topic? Do they agree or is there conflicting information?