Look at Summers v$.$ Dooley found at the end of Chapter $25$ as Cases for Analysis #$6.$ Answer the question at the end of the case. Explain your answer

Please turn Case #$6$ in the Cases for Analysis section at the end of Chapter $25.$ Explain whether the Supreme Court of Idaho upheld the trial court's decision and why or why not. In addition to the text material, feel free to use the Internet to read the case and gather more information to help you answer the questions.

In addition to answering the two questions in your initial statement for the discussion board, you should also include your opinions as to whether the court was correct in its decision. Please use the text and any supporting information to help you answer.

A paragraph or two is fine for the initial statement and one paragraph is fine for your response.

Summers and Dooley formed a partnership for the purpose of operating a trash collection business. The business was operated by the two men, and when either was unable to work, the nonworking partner provided a replacement at his own expense. Summers approached Dooley and requested that they hire a third worker. Dooley refused. Notwithstanding Dooley's refusal, Summers, on his own initiative, hired a worker. Summers paid the employee out of his own pocket. Dooley, upon discovery that a third person had been hired, objected. He stated that the additional labor was not necessary and refused to allow partnership funds to be used to pay the new employee. After paying out more than $$11,000$ in wages without any reimbursement from either partnership funds or his partner, Summers brought suit in the Idaho state courts. The trial court held that Summers was not entitled to reimbursement for the wages he had paid the employee. On appeal, did the Supreme Court of Idaho uphild the trial court's decision? Explain. $[$See: Summers v$.$ Dooley, $481$ P$\mathrm{.}2$d $318($ID$).]$