Question
Lorenzo, G. L., Biesanz, J. C., Human, L. J. (2010). What is beautiful is good and more accurately understood: Physical attractiveness and accuracy in first
Lorenzo, G. L., Biesanz, J. C., Human, L. J. (2010). What is beautiful is good and more accurately understood: Physical attractiveness and accuracy in first impressions of personality. Psychological Science, 21, 1777-1782.
Please read Lorenzo, Biesanz, and Human (2010). Once you have read the article, please answer the following questions:
1) Why did the authors conduct the study? In other words, what gap in the literature were they hoping to fill? {Hint: See the introduction section of this article to answer the question}
2) What methodology did the authors use to answer their research question(s)?
3) Do you believe that methodology used by Lorenzo, Biesanz, and Human (2010) was appropriate? Why or why not?
4) What did the authors find? In other words, what were the results of the study?
5) What are the implications of this study in terms of the importance of "s data" and "I data"? In other words, what do the findings of Lorenzo, Biesanz, and Human (2010) tell us about the accuracy of "I data"? "S data?"
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started