Lucy rents a car from Hertz Car Rental for one week, pursuant to a contract containing an arbitration clause. Lucy drives the car to Arizona and while in Arizona the tire blows. The tow truck driver tells Lucy that the tire blew due to no tread on the tire. Lucy sues Hertz and seeks to avoid the arbitration clause. Assuming that the Federal Arbitration Act applies, is a court more likely to enforce the arbitration clause? Why or why not?