MACRO-ECONOMICS.

1.

Joan proceeds with the settlement of her husband's estate according to his last wishes. QUESTION 1 (10 points] What is the name of the will that Albert left? Question 3 (15 points) Name each of Albert's heirs and what amounts will each heir receive from Albert's Estate? NAME OF THE HEIR AMOUNT TO BE RECEIVED Question 2 (75 points) Write down all the process of the settlement of the estate by stating the exact items that are taken in consideration as well as the detailed calculation of the family patrimony Answer to Question 2 (75 points) Process of the settlement of Albert's estate & Listing the exact items that are taken in considerationContemporary Cars, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit, 814 F.3d 859 (2016). In the Language of the Court as over 200 other dealerships throughout themselves and held HAMILTON, Circuit Judge the United States. off-site meetings. This case focuses on the dealership's . . Contemporary Can, Inc.. service department [which the dealership . . The union filed its repress * * * sells and services cars in Maitland, had previously split into three teams]. petition. The [ National Labor Relicin Florida, Bob Berryhill, the dealership's * * * The International Association Board] approved the proposed bup general manager, is responsible for the of Machinists began a campaign * *. dealership's overall operations, " . . unit, and an election was scheduled to organize the service technicians. Auto Nation owns the dealership, as well In the weeks before the election, A . . . The technicians talked among ryhill and AutoNation vice preside. Brian Davis held group land indi- vidnal] meetings [with the technicians]. instances acted unlawfully to frustrate .. One week before the election, their employees' protected rights to . ." AutoNation vice president * *. " Berryhill * * * announced that the engage in concerted activity and to orga- nize a union. Davis coercively interrogated a * * . dealership was working on fixing prob- technician, Tumeshwar Persaud * *. lens the technicians had and that he . . " The dealership violated [the Davis * * asked him how he felt about was replacing two team leaders, [Andre] Grobler and Oudit Manbahal, with new Act] in the run-up to the election by the union election. * *" The question coercively creating an impression of forced Persaud, who had not previously ram leaders. disclosed his union support, either to surveillance of union activity, interro- .Technician Anthony Roberts disclose his own union sympathies or gating employees about union activity, .was then playing a leading role in to report on his perception of his fellow and soliciting and promising to remedy the union organizing. * *. About a week employees union support. employee grievances. before the union election, the dealership . * Davis held a meeting with hid off Roberts, though Roberts had a employees at which he solicited [Team Leader] Grobler created a employee complaints and, upon hearing higher skill rating, more hours, and more coercive impression of surveillance that management had been unresponsive imiority than many other technicians. when he commented on technician Juan to employee complaints in the past, said Cazorla's attendance of union meetings. that employees could call him or talk ." The technicians voted in favor * * * Grobler asked [ Cazorla] why he to him at any time. This meeting was of unionizing. was in such a rush to leave work * * * part of a series of * * * meetings that .After the election, the dealer- suggesting that Cazorla had "that meet- management held in the run-up to the hip challenged the certification of the ing" to go to. Cazorla pretended not to union election. * * * Davis was implicitly union is the exclusive representative know what Grobler was talking about, promising to remedy grievances with the of a bargaining unit consisting of ser- although he was in fact rushing to get goal of frustrating the union effort. ride technicians. " ." The | National to a union meeting. Again [on a differ- Labor Relations] Board affirmed the ent occasion] Grobler commented to . * * AutoNation " * * promul- certification. Cazorla that he had "better rush" since gated [publicized] an overly broad ""The Board * * * filed a com- he had a meeting * * * . It would have no-solicitation policy in the employee plaint alleging that the dealership and been reasonable for Cazorla to infer from handbook used at all of its facilities. Fumo Nation had violated * ". the Grobler's comments that his union activi- . . . AutoNation's policy prohibited any National Labor Relations Act. * * *An cies were under management surveillance. solicitation on AutoNation property at administrative law judge found * *. any time. "*" The policy " "* amounted that the dealership and AutoNation had * * * Berryhill coercively interrogated to an unfair labor practice because of the indeed violated the Act by interfering employees [when he] called them indi likelihood it would chill protected con- with their employees' protected rights to vidually into his office and asked them certed arriving [ Emphasis added. ] engage in concerted activity and to orga- about union activity. The dealership's Give a union [and] by firing Anthony service director was also present. " . . * * * The dealership's discharge of Roberts due to anti-union animus [hos- The setting of the meetings in Berryhill's Anthony Roberts * *" a week before the uityl. [The judge ordered the dealership office, Berryhill's and the director's posi- election was motivated by anti-union tions of authority and the fact that each animus. to cease its interference with its employ rights and to reinstate Roberts. The rechnician was alone and outnumbered we've also ordered Auto Nation to post a by managers all support the finding of * * * Berryhill's identification of Rob eres as a troublemaker and instigator of notice at all of its dealerships that it was coercion. the organizational campaign established Micinding the no-solicitation rule.] The that anti-union animus was a substantial Board affirmed the * * * order. * * * At the * * * meetings, Berryhill The dealership and AutoNation peti- asked the technicians how the dealership factor motivating Roberts's layoff * . . The dealership's stated reason for fir- looted [the U.S. Court of Appeals for could improve. * * * Berryhill [stated] ing Roberts-that he lacked sufficient leventh Circuit] for judi or judicial review. [The that he was "working on" the problems electronic diagnostic skills-failed to NI.HB cross-petitioned for enforcement and "in progress" on the solutions. establish that Roberts would have been of the neder.) . * *The * *" meetings also included laid off in the absence of anti-union ani- inquiries about the union effort. * * * mus. * * * Roberts was more productive The administrative law judge found. This was an effort to frustrate the union and had a higher skill racing than many and the Board affirmed, that the dealer- organizing drive by soliciting and at least technicians who were retained. ship and Auto Nation in a number of implicitly promising to adjust grievances. Cave 34.3 Continueand the administrative law judge's order petition for review and ENFORCE the Substantial evidence and a reasonable to the extent affirmed by the Board. We Board's order in its entirety. basis in law support the Board's order DENY the dealership and Auto Nation'sMGT345 Business law Week 08 Assignment - Compare and Contrast Laws Choose one of the topics discussed this week. Submit a 400-500 word essay comparing American law to the law of your country of origin on the topic you have chosen. For example, in America, if a person dies without a trust or a will, their property is disbursed in a manner called "intestate" where the court looks at the first level of beneficiaries and divides everything equally. There are also taxes that are incorporated depending on how a person's estate has been dictated. Compare this with an American who owns property in Mexico. If they have an American will or trust, it can cause significant time delay, tax implications, and challenges with the Mexican legal system as the property is distributed. Alternatively, if there is a will or trust executed pursuant to Mexican law, the system becomes much less of a burden on the beneficiaries. Submit your paper comparing American law with the law of your native country on the topic of your choice.Albert, a dentist surgeon, and Joan, businesswoman, were married 10 years ago and have three children Alex (3 years old), Sam (5 years old) and Joe (8 years old). Before their marriage, they signed a Marriage contract in which it is clearly stipulated that: Both spouses shall be separate as to property; Each shall have the sole administration of his or her assets; Each may dispose of them without the consent or authorization of the other spouse; The spouses have the following assets: An Immoveable property registered in Albert's name that is considered as their Family residence. This property is presently valued at 975,000.00$ and has a mortgage of 95,000$; A Condo situated in Miami (USA) under Albert's name valued at 225,000.00$ with no mortgage; where the family spends most of the school vacation; The furniture in the Family residence is evaluated at 125,000.005 and is all paid; The furniture in the other secondary house is evaluated at 25,000.005, with no outstanding debts; > For their family use: The Husband drives a Mercedes Van evaluated at 62,000.00$ with an outstanding debt of 25,000.00$; o The wife drives a Honda Van evaluated at 45,000.005 with an outstanding loan of 12,000.005; Albert and Joan use the 24, when they have an outing without the children; 40 2es Albert has an RRSP valued at 125,000,005; * Joan's RRSP is valued at 145,000.005 Albert's different investments and bank accounts are valued at 225,000.00$ Joan's different investments and bank accounts are valued at 125,000.005 Albert is the equal co-owner with two other dentists. Their clinic is evaluated at 600,000.00$ and is located in a commercial building that the 3 own on equal shares, evaluated at 3,000,000.005 ; Albert dies in a car accident and Joan announces his death in the daily newspaper. Joan has the surprise of her life when Dan presents himself to her and tells her that he is Albert's son. His morn and Albert had an affair during the University graduation and she fell pregnant but never tried to find Albert and inform him of his son's birth. So, when she saw the announcement in the newspaper, she told her son the whole truth because she wanted him to pay his last respects to his deceased sen, father After the funeral, Joan finds in her husband's papers a handwritten document in which Albert awards, upon his death, the quarter of all his assets to his wife and three quarters of all his assets to his children