MAG	DEPTH
0.70	7.2
0.74	2.2
0.64	13.9
0.39	15.5
0.70	3.0
2.20	2.4
1.98	14.4
0.64	5.7
1.22	6.1
0.20	9.1
1.64	17.2
1.32	8.7
2.95	9.3
0.90	12.3
1.76	7.4
1.01	7.0
1.26	17.1
0.00	8.8
0.65	6.0
1.46	19.1
1.62	12.7
1.83	4.7
0.99	8.6
1.56	6.0
0.40	14.6
1.28	4.9
0.83	19.1
1.34	9.9
0.54	16.1
1.25	4.6
0.92	4.9
1.00	16.1
0.79	14.0
0.79	4.2
1.44	5.9
1.00	5.4
2.24	15.6
2.50	7.7
1.79	15.4
1.25	16.4
1.49	4.9
0.84	8.1
1.42	7.5
1.00	14.1
1.25	11.1
1.42	16.0
1.35	5.5
0.93	7.3
0.40	3.1
1.39	6.0

1. Introduce your scenario and data set including the variables provided.
2. Construct a scatterplot of the two variables provided in the spreadsheet. Include a description of what you see in the scatterplot.
3. Find the value of the linear correlation coefficient r and the critical value of r using = 0.05. Include an explanation on how you found those values.
4. Determine whether there is sufficient evidence to support the claim of a linear correlation between the magnitudes and the depths from the earthquakes. Explain.
5. Find the regression equation. Let the predictor (x) variable be the magnitude. Identify the slope and the y-intercept within your regression equation.
6. Is the equation a good model? Explain. What would be the best predicted depth of an earthquake with a magnitude of 2.0? Include the correct units.
7. Conclude by recapping your ideas by summarizing the information presented in context of the scenario.