Major League Baseball agrees to buy all of its balls from Rawling company and Rawling agrees to supply MLB with all the balls they need for 4$ per ball. Later, Rawling claims that there is no binding contract because MLB could technically not buy baseballs for one year and nothing would be required of MLB under the contract. Therefore, Rawling argues that there is no mutuality of consideration and thus no binding contract. Is Rawling correct? Explain.