Make a summary of these 4 cases by answering the FACTS, ISSUES, AND SC RULING.

Case No. 1:

G.R. No. 126780February 17, 2005

Case name: YHT REALTY CORPORATION, ERLINDA LAINEZ and ANICIA PAYAM, petitioners,

vs. THE COURT OF APPEALS and MAURICE McLoughlin, respondents.

FACTS: (Summarize the facts of the case; indicate the allegations of the petitioners and respondents)

ISSUE: Is the Hotel Owner liable? and why?

SC Ruling: (Indicate the decision of the Supreme Court to answer the question posted above; show the law applicable and how the Supreme Court applied it in the case)

Case No. 2:

G.R. No. 189998August 29, 2012

Case name: MAKATI SHANGRI-LA HOTEL AND RESORT, INC., Petitioner, vs.

ELLEN JOHANNE HARPER, JONATHAN CHRISTOPHER HARPER, and RIGOBERTO GILLERA, Respondents.

FACTS: (Summarize the facts of the case; indicate the allegations of the petitioners and respondents)

ISSUE: Is the Hotel Owner liable? and why?

SC Ruling: (Indicate the decision of the Supreme Court to answer the question posted above; show the law applicable and how the Supreme Court applied it in the case)

Case No. 3:

G.R. No. 180440December 5, 2012

Case name: DR. GENEVIEVE L. HUANG, Petitioner, vs.

PHILIPPINE HOTELIERS, INC., DUSIT THANI PUBLIC CO., LTD. And FIRST LEPANTO TAISHO INSURANCE CORPORATION, Respondents.

FACTS: (Summarize the facts of the case; indicate the allegations of the petitioners and respondents)

ISSUE: Is the Hotel Owner liable? and why?

SC Ruling: (Indicate the decision of the Supreme Court to answer the question posted above; show the law applicable and how the Supreme Court applied it in the case)

Case No. 4:

G.R. No. 154259February 28, 2005

Case name: NIKKO HOTEL MANILA GARDEN and RUBY LIM, petitioners, vs.

ROBERTO REYES, a.k.a. "AMAY BISAYA," respondent.

FACTS: (Summarize the facts of the case; indicate the allegations of the petitioners and respondents)

ISSUE: Is the Hotel Owner liable? and Why?

SC Ruling: (Indicate the decision of the Supreme Court to answer the question posted above; show the law applicable and how the Supreme Court applied it in the case)