Make a summary of this text: Perry owns an old butcher shop. He and Della made a valid enforceable written contract for Della to work at the shop for one year at a salary of $60,000 a year. As they were signing the contract, Della asked, "Do I have job security?" Perry responded: "Della, I'll keep you employed here no matter what happens." Six months after the contract was signed the state government passed legislation and regulations upgrading butcher shop health and safety standards. Perry consulted several contractors about making the substantial necessary improvements to his shop and found that compliance with the new regulations would make the continuation of his business completely unprofitable. So Perry closed the butcher shop seven months after hiring Della and fired Della the day he closed the shop. Della intends to sue Perry immediately, asking the court to award her $25,000, representing the unpaid amount on her one-year contract. What set of law governs this contract, UCC or Common Law? Does a valid contract exist between Della & Perry? Explain using offer, aceptane, and consideration in IRAC Does Della have the legal right to sue immediately - or does she need to wait until the end of the contract's one-year duration? Analyze using the facts presented and applying the relevant law in IRAC If this matter goes to trial, will the court allow Della to testify about Perry's statement, "I'll keep you employed here no matter what happens"? Analyze using the facts presented and applying the relevant law in IRAC Because of the new health and safety regulations requiring Perry to make substantial modifications to the shop, does Perry have a good defense to Della's lawsuit? Analyze using the facts presented and applying the relevant law in IRAC