make this a little shorter: In order to reach a reasonable consensus regarding certain rules and policies to promote order and efficiency in the school, it is important for Mr. Johns and Ms. Armbruster to have an open and constructive conversation. They should actively listen to each other's perspectives and concerns, seeking to understand the underlying reasons behind their differing views. By fostering a collaborative and inclusive approach, they can work towards finding common ground and identifying shared goals. One possible case law that may be related to resolving this situation is the landmark Supreme Court case Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District (1969). In this case, the Court ruled that students do not "shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate." This decision emphasizes the importance of balancing students' rights with the need for maintaining order and discipline in a school environment. It serves as a reminder that any rules or policies implemented should be reasonable, justified, and not unduly infringe upon students' constitutional rights. By considering the principles established in Tinker v. Des Moines, Mr. Johns and Ms. Armbruster can work towards a reasonable consensus that respects both the students' desire for freedom and the school's need for order and efficiency