Mance v. Mercedes-Benz USA 901 F.Supp.2d 1147, 2012 U.S. Dist. Lexis 140778 (2012) United States District Court for the Northern District of California 4ut and not oppressive, and it should not have Is the arbitration clause enforeeable? The arbitration proelision was highlighted, 650 al rento, California. The automobile was distrib- leave him with limited appeal rights, but con. the will be ding. The arbitration elause was highlighted who bold, capitalized text. The arbitration clause pro- Decision this lawsitit in U.S. district court against Mercedes. Critical Legal Thinking Questions peat for breach of express and Implied warranties, Is It ethleal for sellers to make consumers go slleging that the arbitration clause was uneonscio- to arbltration rather than to court? Did Mance able. Mercedes-Benz made a motion for an order know that he was subject to the arbitration agreement? agreement