Many states have passed "three strikes & you're out" laws. Namely--an individual who is convicted of a third (3rd) felony crime, no matter where the previous two felonies occurred, is looking at a VERY long sentence--possibly life imprisonment. It's ANY three felonies--even if the felonies are non-violent, theft crimes. Should someone who is convicted a third time, even if there's no violence involved, be sent to prison for good? Remember--when someone goes to prison, the state has to care for that person--food, clothing, medical care, paying prison staff, light, heat, & water for the prison, and all upkeep. The "three strikes" law has increased the prison population & thus, the cost to the taxpayer. So in light of the foregoing, what do you STILL think about "three strikes" laws?