Mardi, a resident of Florida, believes that Vierna, a Kentucky resident, wrongfully harmed Mardi in an automobile accident. The accident took place in Mardi's home state (Florida). When Mardi researches online to see if he has a case to sue Vierna successfully, Mardi comes across a case with facts and issues similar to what happened in the Florida accident; this case took place in North Carolina. If Mardi sues Vierna in Florida and tries to use this case to prove Vierna's wrongdoing, the judge probably would: None of the answers are correct. O Agree with Mardi that the case in North Carolina establishes precedent, and thus the judge will have the case tried in North Carolina Use the North Carolina case as guidance and use stare decision overturn it Use the North Carolina case as guidance, although the judge would be free to establish his/her own decision. Agree with Mardi that the case in North Carolina establishes precedent, and thus the judge must rule on Mardi's behalf