Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

Marginal (incremental) Abatement Costs (NOT total abatement costs) Source A Source B Question 1. The marginal abatement costs for reducing emissions for two sources appear

image text in transcribed

Marginal (incremental) Abatement Costs (NOT total abatement costs) Source A Source B Question 1. The marginal abatement costs for reducing emissions for two sources appear in the table below. Each is currently emitting 9 tons so that total emissions are 18 tons. Please show your work for any calculations. (***Note on interpreting table: for source A, abating from 6 tons of emissions to 5 tons costs 8.) Emissions (tons) 9 8 1 2 7 6 5 8 5 15 21 36 45 58 5 4 12 a. For A and B, calculate the TAC (total abatement costs) for a uniform standard, i.e. equal percentage cutback, to 10 total tons emitted. Emissions are abated so that Emissionsa + Emissionsb= 10. 3 2 67 15 21 36 45 1 78 86 0 TACA = TACB= b. Suppose the regulator uses a cap and trade policy. Each source is given 5 permits for free and permit trade is available. After trade (if any), how many tons are emitted from A and B? Emissions : Emissions: c. Suppose the price paid for each permit exchanged between A & B is equal to the MAC of the final unit abated. What is the total cost of compliance (total abatement cost + total permit cost) for A and for B? TCCA = TCCB = How does the total cost of compliance overall (TCC = TCCA + TCCB) under this cap and trade approach compare to the total cost of compliance under the uniform standard (from part a) for achieving the same aggregate pollution level? State in percentage terms (e.g., "the TCC under the policy is % lower than..."). Marginal (incremental) Abatement Costs (NOT total abatement costs) Source A Source B Question 1. The marginal abatement costs for reducing emissions for two sources appear in the table below. Each is currently emitting 9 tons so that total emissions are 18 tons. Please show your work for any calculations. (***Note on interpreting table: for source A, abating from 6 tons of emissions to 5 tons costs 8.) Emissions (tons) 9 8 1 2 7 6 5 8 5 15 21 36 45 58 5 4 12 a. For A and B, calculate the TAC (total abatement costs) for a uniform standard, i.e. equal percentage cutback, to 10 total tons emitted. Emissions are abated so that Emissionsa + Emissionsb= 10. 3 2 67 15 21 36 45 1 78 86 0 TACA = TACB= b. Suppose the regulator uses a cap and trade policy. Each source is given 5 permits for free and permit trade is available. After trade (if any), how many tons are emitted from A and B? Emissions : Emissions: c. Suppose the price paid for each permit exchanged between A & B is equal to the MAC of the final unit abated. What is the total cost of compliance (total abatement cost + total permit cost) for A and for B? TCCA = TCCB = How does the total cost of compliance overall (TCC = TCCA + TCCB) under this cap and trade approach compare to the total cost of compliance under the uniform standard (from part a) for achieving the same aggregate pollution level? State in percentage terms (e.g., "the TCC under the policy is % lower than...")

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Study Guide To Accompany Financial Accounting In An Economic Context

Authors: Jamie Pratt

6th Edition

0471731110, 978-0471731115

More Books

Students also viewed these Accounting questions

Question

What are negative messages? (Objective 1)

Answered: 1 week ago