Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Question
1 Approved Answer
Mark Kershey, a former Smucker employee, was charged with defrauding the J.M. Smucker Company of more than $4.1 million over a 16-year period. Charges were
Mark Kershey, a former Smucker employee, was charged with defrauding the J.M. Smucker Company of more than $4.1 million over a 16-year period. Charges were filed in October 2014. In 2015, Kershey was sentenced to nearly five years in prison. (Click the icon to view additional information.) Read the requirements. ... Requirement 1. What internal controls could have been used to prevent Kershey from carrying out the false billing scheme? There should have been separation of duties Kershey should not have been allowed to approve the invoices An annual independent audit by the company's CPA might possibly select some of these invoices for inspection and verification. The internal audit department at Smucker should audit off-site employees. Requirement 2. What factors might have contributed to the weak internal control environment that allowed this scheme to exist for 16 years? (If an input field is not used in the table, leave the field empty; do not select an answer.) Lack of: More Info adequate job records compliance monitoring job rotation limited access to records and assets mandatory vacation - X Kershey was the chief airplane mechanic at the company's hangar the Akron-Canton Airport in Ohio from 1990 until he was discharged by Smucker in 2013. From 1997 until the time he left Smucker, Kershey invoiced Smucker for more than $4.1 million by using a fictitious entity he created. He billed Smucker for nonexistent parts and/or work that he himself actually performed as part of his duties as a salaried employee. Most of these invoices were for less than $10,000, which Kershey himself was authorized to approve. A supervisor to Kershey approved the few invoices that were for more than $10,000 based on his trust in Kershey. To carry out his false billing scheme, Kershey set up a post office box in Lake Township, Ohio, using the fictitious entity name of Aircraft Parts Services Co. (APS). He as APS) would then invoice Smucker using porcan Paris Services nonsequential invoice 9 numbers, so it looked like APS was invoicing other companies too. Kershey used the proceeds to purchase and maintain two planes and several automobiles, and to make payments on his house. Kershey was eventually caught in late 2012 when three checks written by Smucker to APS totaling $44,000 were not cashed. When a Smucker employee questioned Kershey about the uncashed checks, Kershey indicated that APS had been sold to another Smucker vendor. The false billing scheme began to unravel and Kershey was fired. Requirements proper approvals 1. What internal controls could have been used to prevent Kershey from carrying out the false billing scheme? 2. What factors might have contributed to the weak internal control environment that allowed this scheme to exist for 16 years? Print Done Print Done
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started