Mark's state legislature passed a law that requires restaurant employees to receive four hours of first aid training that must include instruction on the Heimlich maneuver. The law also requires that employees take reasonable efforts to provide assistance to any customers who experience a health emergency at a restaurant. Mark, a restaurant server, received the required training but did nothing to help a customer who choked on his food at Mark's restaurant. When Mark is charged with violating the statute, he argues that he did not believe that choking qualified as a health emergency.

How will the court interpreting the meaning of "health emergency" in this statute?

Group of answer choices

By using the plain meaning rule because "health emergency" has an ordinary meaning to the general population.

By looking to legislative history because "health emergency" is unclear in this context.

By relying on public policies because "health emergency" is unclear in this context, and the courts first turn to public policy to interpret ambiguous statutes.

None of these.