Martha sued Denise asserting that she was negligent in causing a car accident in which the two were involved. Martha filed the action in federal court seeking $100,000 in damages for personal injuries and damage to her vehicle.

During her case-in-chief, Martha presented evidence of the damage to her vehicle, evidence establishing that the damage resulted from a collision with Denise, and evidence of her injuries.

Martha also testified that when the two vehicles entered the intersection where they collided, her traffic signal was green. During Denise's presentation of her evidence, she introduced a videotape showing that her traffic signal was green as she entered the intersection and Martha's signal was red as she entered the intersection.

During her rebuttal, Martha took the testimony of a witness who was a pedestrian at the time of the accident, who testified that Martha's signal was green as she entered the intersection.

After Martha rested her case, Denise moved for judgment as a matter of law, arguing that Martha has failed to put forward evidence carrying her burden of demonstrating that Denise was negligent and thus responsible for causing the accident. How should the court rule?