Mary hired Oscar, a photographer, to photograph her wedding. Two weeks before the wedding Mary was told by Oscar's studio that Oscar had accepted another event for that date and Oscar would be sending an equally competent photographer.

a. Can Mary sue Oscar for specific performance and force him to take the pictures at her wedding?

b. When Mary learned that Oscar would not be her photographer she demanded her entire deposit back immediately. The Studio said that deposits are non-refundable and they would send another photographer instead of Oscar. They would not give her back her deposit. Will the judge rule in Mary's favor or Oscar's? Why

c. Mary hired another photographer who charged $2,000 more than Oscar. Mary sues Oscar for the additional $2,000 she had to pay. Will the judge rule in her favor? Explain.?