MATCH THE CASE LAW TO THE CORRECT FACTS/LEGAL REASONING Caltex Oil v The Dredge Willemstad Oceanic Sun Line Special v Fay Interfoto Picture v Stiletto Goldsborough Mort 6: Co Ltd v Quinn Stilk v Myrick L Shaddock Ba Associates v Paramatta City Council Romeo v Conservation Commission of the Northern Territory L'Estrange v F Gracoub -.-u -. .--.r .. Case law that established a duty of care can be owed when giving advice or information Case law that applied the weighting test Case law that established that signing an agreement is evidence the party intends to be bound to it. Case law which concluded the consideration was insufficient because of the performance of an existing contractual duty Case law that determine the exemption clause was effective despite the fundamental breach of the contract Case law that concluded that promise to keep the offer is a binding agreement as consideration was given in exchange for the promise Case law that established a duty of care was owed for the economic loss due to the oil pipe being damaged Case law that concluded the terms printed on the ticket were not terms as reasonable notice was not given Choose... 0 Choose... 0 Choose... 0