MATCH THE CASE LAW TO THE CORRECT FACTS/LEGAL REASONING Stilk v Myrick Goldsborough Mort & Co Ltd v Quinn Choose... Case law that concluded that promise to keep the offer is a binding agreement as consideration was given in exchange for the promiso Case law that established a duty of care was owed for the economic loss due to the oil pipe being damaged Case law that established a duty of care can be owed when giving advice or information Case law which concluded the consideration was insufficient because of the performance of an existing contractual duty Case law that applied the weighting test L Shaddock a Associates v Paramatta City Council Choose... Caltex Oil The Dredge Willemstad Choose... Romeo Conservation Commission of the Northern Territory Choose Which of the following are key elements of promissory estoppet? Select one: a. A clear and unequivocal promise must have been made. b. It must be inequitable or unconscionable for the promisor to go back on the promise C. All of the options are correct. d. The promiset must have relied upon the promise. The case of Esanda Finance Corporation Ltd v Peat Marwick Hungerfords is best known for its statements in relation to: MATCH THE CASE LAW TO THE CORRECT FACTS/LEGAL REASONING Stilk v Myrick Goldsborough Mort & Co Ltd v Quinn Choose... Case law that concluded that promise to keep the offer is a binding agreement as consideration was given in exchange for the promiso Case law that established a duty of care was owed for the economic loss due to the oil pipe being damaged Case law that established a duty of care can be owed when giving advice or information Case law which concluded the consideration was insufficient because of the performance of an existing contractual duty Case law that applied the weighting test L Shaddock a Associates v Paramatta City Council Choose... Caltex Oil The Dredge Willemstad Choose... Romeo Conservation Commission of the Northern Territory Choose Which of the following are key elements of promissory estoppet? Select one: a. A clear and unequivocal promise must have been made. b. It must be inequitable or unconscionable for the promisor to go back on the promise C. All of the options are correct. d. The promiset must have relied upon the promise. The case of Esanda Finance Corporation Ltd v Peat Marwick Hungerfords is best known for its statements in relation to