Match the legal principle, legal concept, and/or legal test on the left with the correctly corresponding case law from the drop-down menu on the right Choose the best answer and only select one case per principle/concept/test. NOTE: make sure to scroll down and view the entire list in the drop-down menu before making your selection. In this case it was determined that for situations of negligent misstatements causing economic loss, a duty of care is owed where it is foreseeable that clients would rely on the advice of the Haig v. Bamford professionals providing that advice and, furthermore, that professionals are held to a higher standard