Matoika Marine Inc. has just finished its operations for August, which was a particularly busy month. They processed 24% more product than had been originally planned for the month. A report prepared by Management comparing actual costs to budgeted costs appears below. Matoika Marine Cost Control Report For the Month Ended August 31 Actual 800 Budget 500 Variance 300 F Units Produced Variable costs: Marine supplies Emmission tests Other Variable Administrative supplies Total variable cost Fixed costs: Staff salaries Equipment depreciation Rent Utilities Total fixed cost Total cost $ 8,500 8,500 $ 5,250 1,900 6,800 1,150 $3,250 U 1,700 U 550 325 19,450 13,525 750 U 225 U 5,925 U 18,000 18,000 3,600 2,900 700 U 1,800 1,800 650 24,050 $43,500 540 23,240 $36,765 110 U 810 U $ 6,735 U The managing director was very unhappy with this report, claiming that his costs were higher than expected. He also pointed out that the additional costs had been fully covered by payments from suppliers. The accountant who prepared the report pointed out that actual costs were a lot higher than promised in the budget. Required: 1. Prepare a new performance report for August using the flexible budget approach. (Note Even though some of these costs might be classified as direct costs rather than overhead, the flexible budget approach can still be used to prepare a flexible budget performance report). (Indicate the effect of each variance by selecting "F" for favourable, "U" for unfavourable, and "None" for no effect (i.e.. zero variance). Round "Cost Formula" answers to 2 decimal places) Matoika Marine Flexible Budget Performance Report For The Month Ended August 31 Variable costs Marine supplies Emmission tests Other variable Expenses Administrative supplies Total variable cost Fixed costs Staff salaries Equipment depreciation Rent Utilities Total fixed cost Total cost Actual Cost Formula (Per unit) 800 Spending or Budget Variance Flexible Budget Static Budget Activity-Level (units) 800 500