Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

Meyers was under contract with Henderson to install overhead doors in a factory that Henderson was building. Meyers obtained the dissembled doors from the manufacturer.

Meyers was under contract with Henderson to install overhead doors in a factory that Henderson was building. Meyers obtained the dissembled doors from the manufacturer. His contract with Henderson required Meyers to furnish all labor, materials, tools, and equipment to satisfactorily complete the installation of all overhead doors. Henderson felt that the doors were not installed properly and paid less than one-half of the contract price after subtracting his cost for correcting the installation. Because of a business sale and other complications, Meyers did not sue Henderson for the difference in payment until five years later. Henderson raised the defense that because the contract was for the sale of goods, it was barred by the Code's four-year statute of limitations. Meyers claimed that it was a contract for services and that suit could be brought within six years. Who is correct? Why?

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Fundamentals Of Futures And Options Markets

Authors: Jonn C. Hull

8th International Edition

0133382850, 9780133382853

More Books

Students also viewed these Finance questions

Question

What challenges does GE have to face in the HRM field today?

Answered: 1 week ago