Mi s.t. Secure Super Secure Michigan New York 1 New York 2 Ohio California

New York 1 York 2 integ r m ming model that The p rejected nds super S cloud on the Infer centers: one each in Mi d Califc two in York. these nters to keep re data and tos Data Center super secu and SO su minimi the per S i updated Form u late 4 5. Giv ent. Which date centers across the Cost ($ united States and. Each date that store and the rs that are dedited to Data Ce nter M ich igan t. sup; that cl upda updat tly has five cutdeted ce nter tc m e e t p roj 1 if O otherw d the chigen, Ohio, en each type cf center Sec u g crease in capacity for total added pacity. in millions of dollars g the epacity cf math Pade Operation Relticns re for form total inc acity cf SO S d at the cost of the (S) the m I.d used tc determine the optim for m o luticn to the nter(s) do you cl Services update? (SeQt all that apply.) Michigan New York 1 New York