Michael went deer hunting with Nate. After seeing influence the outcome of the case. Do you agree bushes move, Michael quickly fired his rifle at what he with the attorney? Your answer must include a defithought was a deer. However, Nate had caused the nition of contributory negligence. movement in the bushes and was seriously injured by the c. If Michael can establish comparative negligence on bullet. Nate survived and later sued Michael on the the part of Nate, would the outcome of the case be grounds that "Michael's negligence was the proximate changed? Explain your answer. cause of the injury." d. Assume that Michael and Nate are hunting on farm- a. Based on these facts, is Michael guilty of negligence? land without obtaining permission from the owner. Your answer must include a definition of negligence If Michael fell into a marshy pond covered by weeds and the essential elements of negligence. and injured his back, would the property owner be b. Michael's attorney believes that if contributory liable for damages? Explain your answer. negligence could be established, it would greatly