Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

Microeconomics - game theory and oligopoly e) Now consider Sophia. Sophia knows the logic from part d. Based on the reduced payoff matrix, between steak

Microeconomics - game theory and oligopoly

image text in transcribedimage text in transcribed
e) Now consider Sophia. Sophia knows the logic from part d. Based on the reduced payoff matrix, between steak and grains, what food would Sophia pick? Why? Now consider a further reduced payoff matrix after eliminating the row corresponding to the strictly dominated food. f) Back to Lara. Lara knows the logic from part e. Between the remaining two wines, what wine would she pick? Why? Now consider a further reduced payoff matrix after eliminating the column corresponding to the strictly dominated wine. g) Back to Sophia. Sophia knows the logic from part f. Between the remaining two foods, which food would Sophia pick? Consequently, which wine would Lara pick? You should nd only one raonalizable s11'ategy left for each player, which is the (pure strategy) Nash equilibrium of the game. Problem 2 Two friends, Sophia and Lara are having dinner together. Sophia is cooking, while Lara is bringing the wine. Sophia doesn't know what wine Lara will bring and Lara doesn't know what food Sophia is cooking. The two friends' payoffs from the dinner party depend on the choice of food and wine according to the payoffs below. The game is common knowledge. a) What is Sophia's best response function? Does Sophia have a strictly dominant strategy? b) What is Lara's best response function? Does Lara have a strictly dominant strategy? c) What is the (pure strategy) Nash equilibrium of this game? In class we mentioned that players who have a strictly dominant strategy have no need to form conjectures over what the other players might be doing before making their move. They should simply go with their strictly dominant strategies In reverse, if a player has a strategy that always yields lower payoffs than another (this is called a strictly dominated strategy), it would be silly for the player to ever choose this strategy. Using common knowledge, iteratively eliminating strictly dominated strategies can help us rationalize some Nash equilibria. d) Consider Lara. Between Red and Rose, what wine would she pick? Why? Now consider a reduced payoff matrix after eliminating the column corresponding to the strictly dominated wine from the game

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Understanding Econometrics With Economic Applications

Authors: Dennis Halcoussis

1st Edition

0030348064, 9780030348068

More Books

Students also viewed these Economics questions

Question

Explain why change efforts fail

Answered: 1 week ago

Question

Describe the six elements of communication.

Answered: 1 week ago

Question

Appreciate important legal implications of performance appraisals

Answered: 1 week ago