Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Question
00
1 Approved Answer
Microsoft Excel Sensitivity Report Adjustable Cells Final Reduced Objective Allowable Allowable Cell Name Value Cost Coefficient Increase Decrease $C$4 Value: X1 12 0 2 1.00E+30
Microsoft Excel Sensitivity Report Adjustable Cells Final Reduced Objective Allowable Allowable Cell Name Value Cost Coefficient Increase Decrease $C$4 Value: X1 12 0 2 1.00E+30 0 $D$4 Value: X2 0 0 4 0 1.00E+30 Constraints Final Shadow Constraint Allowable Allowable Cell Name Value Price R.H. Side Increase Decrease $E$10 Used: 12 0 2 10 1.00E+30 $E$8 Used: -12 0 8 1.00E+30 20 $E$9 Used: 12 2 12 1.00E+30 10 Is the optimal solution to this problem unique? [Without resolving the model] can you tell what will be the optimal solution to this problem if the vaue of the objective function coefficient for variable X1 is zero? How much can the objective function coefficient for variable X2 decrease before changing the optimal solution? Given that this is a maximization problem, if management could increase the RHS value for any of the constraints for identical costs, which would you choose to increase and why?
Microsoft Excel Sensitivity Report | ||||||||||||||||
Adjustable Cells | ||||||||||||||||
Final | Reduced | Objective | Allowable | Allowable | ||||||||||||
Cell | Name | Value | Cost | Coefficient | Increase | Decrease | ||||||||||
$C$4 | Value: X1 | 12 | 0 | 2 | 1.00E+30 | 0 | ||||||||||
$D$4 | Value: X2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 1.00E+30 | ||||||||||
Constraints | ||||||||||||||||
Final | Shadow | Constraint | Allowable | Allowable | ||||||||||||
Cell | Name | Value | Price | R.H. Side | Increase | Decrease | ||||||||||
$E$10 | Used: | 12 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 1.00E+30 | ||||||||||
$E$8 | Used: | -12 | 0 | 8 | 1.00E+30 | 20 | ||||||||||
$E$9 | Used: | 12 | 2 | 12 | 1.00E+30 | 10 | ||||||||||
Is the optimal solution to this problem unique? | ||||||||||||||||
[Without resolving the model] can you tell what will be the optimal solution to this problem if the vaue of the objective function coefficient for variable X1 is zero? | ||||||||||||||||
How much can the objective function coefficient for variable X2 decrease before changing the optimal solution? | ||||||||||||||||
Given that this is a maximization problem, if management could increase the RHS value for any of the constraints for identical costs, which would you choose to increase and why? | ||||||||||||||||
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access with AI-Powered Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started