MID-TERM PRACTICE EXAM PART II. SHORT ESSAY Part II requires you to write the answer to the question as a "Short Essay." Assume the jurisdiction relies on traditional common law approaches to real and personal property unless specified in the question throughout this part of the exam and entire exam as well. You are given 30 minutes to complete this part of the practice exam. In writing and explaining your answer to the Short Essay question, cite to any relevant cases, materials and notes assigned and/or discussed in the course, and in the Workshop sessions. Simply citing, for example, to Johnson v. McIntosh or Shelley v. Kraemer should be sufficient. Make sure your answer to the essay portion of the practice exam, like all of the writing requirements for this course, STRICTLY conform to the Rules for Legal Writing in ACLS II (see Skills Workshop 2 Reading Assignment B). SHORT ESSAY QUESTION Amadeus and Beethoven were neighboring landowners who desired to preserve the residential character of their neighborhood. To that end, they executed an agreement, binding on their "successors, heirs, and assigns," that they would never cause or permit their respective parcels to be used for anything other than one.)