Mike Jones had been living at the same address in Springfield, California, for more than 30 years when he discovered that his water was emitting a strong odor. When he brought this observation to the attention of many of his neighbors, they complained of a similar odor. After some investigating, Mike discovered that a large corporation, the hypothetical Springfield Gas & Electric, had been dumping chromium 6, a possible carcinogen, into the water supply for decades. Mike then went to a lawyer with this discovery. The lawyer then filed suit against Springfield Gas & Electric in the name of the nearly 1,000 residents in Springfield with contaminated water.

What if the courts determined that certain Springfield G&E high-ranking officers committed a tort when they engaged in their dumping chemicals with the corporation? In other words, could the corporation itself be held liable for the torts of the officers?

Multiple Choice

Yes, due to the doctrine of respondeat superior.

Not unless it specifically says the corporation can be found liable in the articles of incorporation.

Yes, because shareholders are taxed for their profits.

No, the officers are not agents of the corporation.

No, due to the doctrine respondeat superior.