Mitch and his family were holidaying in a remote rural area. Mitch wanted to make this holiday experience very memorable for his family, so he organised with a tour operator 'Family Friendly Adventures' (FFA) to take his family on an overnight desert adventure. Promised activities on this adventure included bushwalking, abseiling, camping and river fishing. Mitch fell and suffered severe injuries when the rope supporting him snapped while abseiling. An investigation later found the ropes were not properly maintained by FFA and this caused him to fall. Mary (Mitch's wife) suffered depression and anxiety after seeing Mitch fall and suffer the injuries. PICK ALL the correct steps that Mitch needs to satisfy in order to seek damages for negligence a. Did Mitch suffer damages because of FAA's negligence and are the damages reasonably foreseeable? of b. Does Mitch owe FAA a duty of care? c. Does FAA owe Mitch a duty of care? d. Did FAA breach the duty of care owed to Mitch? Which case law is similar in facts to this case study? O a. Jaensch v Coffey of b. Donoghue v Stevenson O c. None of the options O d. Chapel v HartWhat established relationship exists between Mitch and FFA? O a. Event operator and consumer b. Teacher and student (2. Doctor and patient d. Manufacturer and consumer Clear my choice What test/rule t is relevant in establishing whether the FFA owes a duty of care to Mary? a. But for test b. Weighting test c. s 73 Wrongs Act 0 d. Neighbourtest Clear my choice What test is relevant in establishing whether the FFA owes a duty of care to Mitch? a. But for test 0 b. Neighbour test c. Weighting test d. Peer professional opinion