MNE Country Final Paper Canada

I have already written the Abstract:

Multinational enterprises (MNEs) refer to companies that operate in various countries in different parts of the world. There are various MNEs both in developed nations as well the developing world. In my paper, I will talk about all there is to know about some Multinational Enterprises in the country of Canada as well as the economy of Canada. Canada has 3 firms among the top 100: The Thomson Corporation, SEAGRAM, and ALCAN. In total, 1565 parent firms reside in Canada (out of a world total of 38 747), and there are 4708 affiliates of foreign firms in Canada (out of a world total of 265 551). Canada also has General Motors of Canada Limited which is a subsidiary of General Motors, the largest vehicle, automobile, and industrial corporation in the world. Canada has a highly developed economy and it is one of the largest in the world. Canada's economy is somewhat similar to the United States, with a key difference. Canada exports more than they import.

RUBRIC:

Final APA Paper

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction

10 to >8.0 pts The introduction (thesis) is inviting, states the main topic, and previews the structure of the paper.

8 to >6.0 pts The introduction (thesis) clearly states the main topic and previews the structure of the paper, but is not particularly inviting to the reader.

6 to >4.0 pts The introduction (thesis) states the main topic, but does not adequately preview the structure of the paper nor is it particularly inviting to the reader.

4 to >0 pts There is no clear introduction (thesis) of the main topic or structure of the paper.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent

30 to >26.0 pts Relevant, telling, quality details give the reader important information that goes beyond the obvious or predictable. Work is clear, precise, well reasoned, and insightful. Demonstrates excellent preparation. Paper addresses all assigned points.

26 to >22.0 pts Supporting details and information are relevant, but one key issue or portion of the storyline is unsupported. Work is clear, precise, and well-reasoned. Demonstrates good preparation. Paper address assigned points.

22 to >18.0 pts Supporting details and information are relevant, but several key issues or portions of the storyline are unsupported. Demonstrates adequate preparation. Paper addresses most assigned points.

18 to >0 pts Supporting details and information are typically unclear or not related to the topic. Demonstrates inadequate preparation. Paper inadequately addresses assigned points.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Thinking

20 to >18.0 pts Offers analysis, synthesis, and evaluation of course material in a manner that enhances student's learning. Provides insight. Provides pertinent and legitimate information that supports the main points and shows thoughtful, in-depth analysis.

18 to >16.0 pts Ability to use basic skills. Knows the basic course material, however, does not show evidence of trying to interpret or analyze them. Provides few insights.

16 to >12.0 pts Offers interpretation and analysis of course material. Information provides reasonable support for main points and demonstrates some analysis. Provides some insight.

12 to >0 pts Demonstrates poor thinking and performance, representing thinking that is unclear, imprecise, and poorly reasoned.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar, Spelling & Word Choice

10 to >8.0 pts Writer makes no errors in grammar or spelling that distracts the reader from the content. Word choice is consistently accurate and appropriate.

8 to >6.0 pts Writer makes 1-2 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content. Word choice is generally appropriate.

6 to >4.0 pts Writer makes 3-4 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content. Work choice is adequate and some words may be used inappropriately.

4 to >0 pts Writer makes more than 4 errors in grammar or spelling that distracts the reader from the content. Many words are used inappropriately.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSources and APA

10 to >8.0 pts All sources used for quotes and facts are credible and cited correctly. APA format is used accurately and consistently throughout the paper and on the reference page. Scholarly sources are appropriate.

8 to >6.0 pts All sources used for quotes and facts are credible and most are cited correctly. APA format is used with minor errors. Scholarly sources are appropriate.

6 to >4.0 pts Many sources used for quotes and facts are less than credible (suspect) and/or are not cited correctly. Format of the paper is not APA.

4 to >0 pts Most sources used for quotes and facts are credible and cited correctly. There are frequency errors in APA format.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion

10 to >8.0 pts The conclusion is strong and leaves the reader with a feeling that they understand what the writer is "getting at."

8 to >6.0 pts The conclusion is recognizable and ties up almost all the loose ends.

6 to >4.0 pts The conclusion is recognizable, but does not tie up several loose ends.

4 to >0 pts There is no clear conclusion, the paper just ends.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAbstract

10 to >8.0 pts The abstract is clear and concise, addressing the key areas and issues covered, and provides an excellent overview of the paper.

8 to >6.0 pts The abstract provides a summary of the paper, but is not particularly helpful in revealing the paper's purpose to the reader.

6 to >4.0 pts The abstract states the main topic, but does not adequately preview the purpose of the paper nor is it particularly helpful to the reader.

4 to >0 pts There is no clear abstract sharing the main topics of the paper, or if present it may include information irrelevant to the purpose of the paper.

10 pts

Total Points: 100

Let me know any other questions you have. I appreciate all the help! Thanks so much!