Moral conflicts and dilemmas face us every day. What is the best way to demonstrate an clearer understanding of Kohlberg's stages. And what is an ideal example of a situation that ties into Kohlbergs stages, and how it might be resolved differently depending on whether using conventional or postconventional moral thinking in Kohlberg's stages. The very same behavior can be mentally justified with any one of the levels of moral reasoning. It's not what a person chooses to do, but what is the best way to explain the choice that tells the level of moral reasoning.