Question
Mortgage Fraud (Fraud Triangle and Detection) Hotel worker Danny Ruiz was living with his wife and four children in a cramped New York apartment when
Mortgage Fraud (Fraud Triangle and Detection)
Hotel worker Danny Ruiz was living with his wife and four children in a cramped New York apartment when he saw a television ad promising the family a way out."Why rent when you can own your own home?" Pennsylvania builder Gene Percudani asked.The company even offered to pay his rent for a year, while he saved for a down payment.So the Ruizes fled the city for the Pocono Mountains, where they bought a three-bedroom Cape Cod in 1999 for $171,000.But when they tried to refinance less than two years later, the home was valued at just $125,000."I flipped," says Mr. Ruiz.His wife he says "went nuts."
Gene Percudani, a 51-year-old native of Queens, New York, built a thriving home-building business in this market, running folksy television ads offering New Yorkers new homes in Pennsylvania.If they joined Mr. Percudani's program, called Why Rent, homeowners would find financing through another of his companies, Chapel Creek Mortgage, which brokered loans from J.P. Morgan Chase and the companies Chase Manhattan Mortgage unit.
For years, the "Why Rent" program appealed to workers with modest salaries such as Eberht Rios, a truck driver for UPS.The Rios bought a home in the Poconos for $140,000.This year, when he tied to refinance, he was told the home was only valued at $100,000.One local appraiser, Dominick Stranieri, signed off on most of the Why Rent deals that state officials now say were overpriced, including the Rioses' and the Ruizes'.Mr. Percudani's firm picked Stranieri, his appraiser, because of his quick work and low fee of $250, instead of the typical $300 to $400.In exchange for a steady stream of work, Mr. Stranieri accepted without question valuations from Mr. Percudani's company.
Other common methods of creating revenues include investors and others buying distressed properties and then, using inflated appraisals, selling them for a big profit.In order to secure the efforts of a "dirty appraiser" those involved with the fraud would pay up to $1,500 under the table on top of the appraiser's standard fee of $400.
Another unique twist to the plot is that few of the people involved in making mortgage loans these days have a long-term interest in them.Traditionally, bankers had made loans directly and held them, giving the lenders a strong incentive to find fair appraisals to protect their interests.Today, many appraisers are picked by independent mortgage brokers, who are paid per transaction and have little stake in the long-term health of the loans.Many lenders also have lost a long-term interest in their loans, because they sell them off to investors.Appraisers increasingly fear that if they don't go along with higher valuations sought by brokers, their business will dry up.
Think a county appraiser would do lots better than a private practitioner?Joel Marcus, a New York-based attorney recently had his property valued at $2.2 million by a county appraiser, up from $2 million the previous year, which means about a $7,200 jump in his property-tax bill.Based on recent home sales in his neighborhood, Mr. Marcus believes his property is valued at between $1.7 million and $1.8 million, and he has appealed his appraisal.
Although, a good appraisal requires hours of legwork, visiting a property to check its condition, and coming up with at least three comparable sales, Mr. Percudani says he isn't surprised that later appraisals, or even different appraisals made at the same time, could result in different values. "Appraisals are opinions," he says."Value, like beauty, is in the eye of the beholder."Stranieri and Percudani deny any wrongdoing and say they operated independently and that any home that declined in value did so because of a weaker economy."It's like buying a stock," Mr. Percudani says in an interview "The value goes up.The value goes down."
Requirements
1.How is an opportunity created to commit appraisal fraud?Does the appraiser act alone or is collusion routinely involved?
2.How is appraisal fraud detected?Is intent to deceive easily proven in appraisal fraud?
3.What pressures or perceived pressures can motivate appraisers to make faulty valuations?
4.How does appraiser rationalize their fraudulent behavior?
5.Why would a county perceive pressure to fraudulently inflate property values?
6.What controls would help to prevent appraisal fraud?
7.What natural controls exist to prevent homeowners from the desire to "massage the values" of their homes?Hint: think about a homeowner's motivation
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
![blur-text-image](https://dsd5zvtm8ll6.cloudfront.net/includes/images/document_product_info/blur-text-image.webp)
Get Instant Access with AI-Powered Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
![blur-text-image](https://dsd5zvtm8ll6.cloudfront.net/includes/images/document_product_info/blur-subtext-image.webp)
Step: 3
![blur-text-image](https://dsd5zvtm8ll6.cloudfront.net/includes/images/document_product_info/blur-subtext-image.webp)
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started