Moulton Cavity & Mold INC., agreed to manufacture twenty-six innersole molds to be purchased by Lyn-Flex. Moulton delivered the twenty six molds to Lyn-Flex after Lyn-Flex allegedly approved the sample molds. However, Lyn-Flex rejected the molds, claiming that the molds did not satisfy the specifications exactly, and denied that it had ever approved the sample molds. Moulton then sued, contending that Lyn-Flex wrongfully rejected the molds. Lyn-Flex argued that the Code's perfect tender rule permitted its rejection of the imperfect molds, regardless of Moulton's substantial performance.

What is the Issue, Rule, Application, and Conclusion?

Would the result would be different under standard?

Thank you!!