Moulton Cavity & Mold Inc. agreed to manufacture twenty-six innersole molds to be purchased by Lyn-Flex. Moulton delivered the twenty-six molds to Lyn-Flex after Lyn-Flex allegedly

approved the sample molds. However, Lyn-Flex rejected the molds, claiming that the molds did

not satisfy the specifications exactly, and denied that it had ever approved the sample molds.

Moulton then sued, contending that Lyn-Flex wrongfully rejected the molds. Lyn-Flex, argued

that the Code's perfect tender rule permitted its rejection of the imperfect molds, regardless of

Moulton's substantial performance. Decision?

What is the Issue Rule Application and Conclusion?

Would the result would be different under standard contract law.