Mountain Stuff is a Colorado corporation selling mountain-climbing equipment. It maintains a websitethat provides information about its products as well as general information about mountain climbing. Aconsumer cannot purchase equipment directly from the site but can request order forms to purchaseequipment directly from Mountain Stuff. Mountain Stuff maintains no offices outside Colorado, and noproducts are sold by retailers outside Colorado. After an accident involving climbers using theequipment of a competitor, Utah Mountain Sports, Mountain Stuff prints an article on the general[1]information portion of its website that accuses Utah Mountain Sports of intentionally manufacturing andselling defective and substandard equipment. There is no direct proof referenced in the article and infact the article is incorrect. Nevertheless, other articles are written referencing the Mountain Stuffstatements, and Utah Mountain Sports has seen an otherwise unexplained 10 percent decline in itstypically $1 million-a-month sales in each of the three months since the Mountain Stuff article waspublished. If Utah Mountain Sports sues in federal court in Utah, will the court be able to find personaland subject matter jurisdiction under these circumstances?