Mr Asrul, the purchasing agent for a Tenggara Manufacturing Division was considering the possibility of purchasing a component from a new supplier. The price is RM0.70 which is below the standard price of RM0.90. The favorable price variance would help Asrul to produce an impressive performance report which is good enough to qualify him for an annual bonus. More importantly, a good performance this year would secure him a position at the headquarters with a significant salary increase.

However, there was doubt on his part knowing the background of the new supplier. Reports were basically negative, indicating that the supplier was known to make two to three delivery on time, but being unreliable there on. There were also questions regarding the quality of the parts delivered, with life of the components being 25 percent less than what normal sources would provide.

If the component was purchased, no problems would surface for several months. By then, Asrul would already be at the headquarters. Considering the minimum personal risk, Asrul continues with the decision to purchase from the new supplier.

Required:

Discuss whether Asrul’s action is ethical. Do you think that the use of standards and practice of holding individuals accountable for their achievement played major roles in Asrul’s decisions?